Goods and Services Tax : Explore provisions and implications of Chapter XXI of CGST Act and Chapter IX of IGST Act, covering job work, compliance, and proc...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court upholds constitutional validity of GST anti-profiteering law and rules. Detailed analysis of implications for bus...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitutional validity of Anti-Profiteering provisions under GST, their impact on businesses and consumers, and the l...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Courts stance on anti-profiteering clause: Valid but arbitrary? Explore the intricacies, challenges, and flaws in the a...
Goods and Services Tax : The anti-profiteering provisions under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) were introduced to ensure that businesses pass on the bene...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : Detailed analysis of Competition Commission of India's order regarding Cinema Ventures Pvt Ltd not passing GST rate reduction bene...
Goods and Services Tax : The average base price of tickets sold before and after the GST rate reduction was compared. The DGAP found that the company had n...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the DGAP report on GST rate reduction impact on movie ticket prices, alleged profiteering by the respondent, detailed inve...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the CCI's order on Asian GPR Multiplex's alleged GST profiteering, detailed investigation findings, and implications under...
Goods and Services Tax : Read the full text of the Competition Commission of India's order on Abhilash Mohanty Vs Vertex Homes Pvt. Ltd regarding CGST rule...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
The Respondent has not disputed the findings of the DGAP regarding method of computation of profiteering and the amount worked out by him. As such, the Authority finds no reason to differ from the above-detailed computation of profiteering in the DGAP Report or the methodology adopted and hence, the Authority determines the profiteered amount for the period from 01.07.2017 to 31.12.2018, in the instant case, as Rs. 1,42,45,741/-, for the project Sports Ville.
The present report dated 264)2.2021 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed Investigation under Rule 129(6) of the CGST Rules. 2017 The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017 and alleged that the Respondent.
Sh. Samit Chakraborty Vs Cloudtail India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority finds that the DGAP has correctly calculated the profiteered amount as Rs. 9,84,354/- (Rs. 5,37,208/- on closing stock & Rs. 4,47,146/- on fresh stock) as mentioned in Table-A above, which was to be passed on to the buyers of the impugned item by way […]
Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs Perfect Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) It is established from the perusal of the above facts that the Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 6.55% of the turnover during the period from 01 07.2017 to 31.03.2019 amounting Rs. 4.74,88,840/- It has been verified by the DGAP that […]
Sh. Nagendra Kumar Biyani Vs Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. (NAA) The Respondent has contended that Section 171 of the CGST Act and Rule 126 of the CGST Rules are violative of Article 14 and Article 19 of the Constitution of India. In this connection, this Authority holds that the Authority has not acted in any […]
Sh. Ashok Kumar Singh Vs Lifeways Infrastate Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The only issue to be examined is as to whether there was any net benefit of ITC with the introduction of GST. The Authority finds that, the ITC, as a percentage of the turnover, that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April-2016 […]
Umesh Kumar Shukla Vs. Pan Realtors Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) We have considered the Report furnished by the DGAP, the submissions made by the Respondent and the other material placed on record. On examining the various submissions, the observations of this Authority are as follows:- a. Upon perusal of Table-B, it is observed that while calculating […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs L’Oreal India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) NAA held that – a. Under the provisions of Section 171(2) of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 133, the Authority finds that commensurate reduction in the price of the goods has not been effected by the Respondent after the GST rates were reduced […]
Parveen Kumar Bansal Vs Sternal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Authority finds and determines that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 42,21,321/- for the project `Signum 36′ during the period of investigation i.e. 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2019. The above amount that has been profiteered by the Respondent from his shop buyers/ recipients of supply […]
Sh. Ritesh Kumar Khandelwal Vs Forever Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Authority finds that the allotment of units, agreements, booking, construction activity and receipt of payments had taken place in the post-GST era. The draw of lots for allotment of houses was conducted on 05.07.2017 in the presence of the committee constituted under the Affordable Housing […]
