VAT Payment not Mandatory for Abatement; Revenue Bears Burden of Proving Consideration Receipt: CESTAT Delhi

Jyoti Sarup Mittal Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

Introduction: The case of Jyoti Sarup Mittal vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Delhi) delves into the nuanced realm of works contracts, tax statutes, and exemptions. This article analyzes key aspects such as auditorium construction, works contract services, exemptions for governmental authorities, arbitration awards, and the role of Form 26AS entries.

1. Interpretation of Tax Statute: Auditorium

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.