Service Tax Tax Demand Set Aside Due to Non-Examination of Exemption Claims: CESTAT Mumbai
UBR Legal Advocates
16 Dec 2025
279 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Service Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Service Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
The Hon’ble court set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the original authority for fresh consideration.
The appeal before the CESTAT, Mumbai concerned a tax demand of ₹39,35,96,714 raised against the appellant under section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the period 2015–16 to 2017–18, on the allegation that several taxable services had been provided without payment of service tax. The appellant contended that the services subjected to tax in
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


Comments are closed.