Customs Value Enhancement Set Aside for Ignoring Mandatory Valuation Rules
UBR Legal Advocates
18 Dec 2025
300 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Custom Duty |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Custom Duty |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : Nico Extrusions Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nico Extrusions Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
The Hon’ble bench observed that the impugned orders in upholding the enhancement of value is not consistent with the legal provisions of the Customs statute in respect of valuation of imported goods. Accordingly, the impugned orders do not stand the scrutiny of law and therefore these are not legally sustainable.
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, allowed the appeals filed against two Orders-in-Appeal that had upheld enhancement of declared import v
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


Comments are closed.