Case Law Details
Case Name : Pankaj Ispat Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pankaj Ispat Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Forfeited amount for Order Cancellation was not consideration for any service, and therefore not subject to service tax: CESTAT Delhi
In the case of Pankaj Ispat Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, the CESTAT Delhi addressed whether the amount forfeited due to the cancellation of an order could be considered taxable as a service under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant, registered for providing taxable services such as Transport of Goods by Road, had forfeited amounts from a buyer who breached a contract...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


