Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pankaj Ispat Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pankaj Ispat Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) Forfeited amount for Order Cancellation was not consideration for any service, and therefore not subject to service tax: CESTAT Delhi In the case of Pankaj Ispat Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, the CESTAT Delhi addressed whether the amount forfeited due to the cancellation of an order could be considered taxable as a service under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant, registered for providing taxable services such as Transport of Goods by Road, had forfeited amounts from a buyer who breached a contract...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031