No reversal under Cenvat rule 6 is required in case of clearances to SEZ unit/developers

CESTAT, BANGALORE BENCH

Ashlyn Enterprises

versus

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore

P.G. CHACKO, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Central Excise Appeal NO. 483 OF 2011

Date of Pronouncement – 07.11.2012

ORDER

1. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the challenge is against a demand raised on the appellant in terms of Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 200

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.