Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner Of Central Excise Vs M/s Bhawani Enterprises (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/315 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/02/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Sponsored
In view of the decision of the Gujarat High Court, that no discretion is vested in the authority to levy a penalty below the minimum prescribed limit, it is held that penalty imposed under Section 76 cannot be reduced by invoking the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 – Penalty has to be either the quantum imposed under Section 76 or Nil if reasonable cause is shown – Penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 by original authority is restored.
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH, AHMEDABAD
COURT NO.II
Appeal No. ST/315 of 2009
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.