Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner Of Central Excise Vs M/s Bhawani Enterprises (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Sponsored
In view of the decision of the Gujarat High Court, that no discretion is vested in the authority to levy a penalty below the minimum prescribed limit, it is held that penalty imposed under Section 76 cannot be reduced by invoking the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 – Penalty has to be either the quantum imposed under Section 76 or Nil if reasonable cause is shown – Penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 by original authority is restored.
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNA
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.