Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Service Tax

Exemption notification cannot be given retrospective effect unless expressly provided

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2012 taxguru.in 882
Case Name
Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. V. Satya Murthy Joint Venture Vs Commissioner of Service-tax, Hyderabad (CESTAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


CESTAT, BANGALORE BENCH

Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. V. Satya Murthy Joint Venture

V/s.

Commissioner of Service-tax, Hyderabad

FINAL ORDER NOS. 299 TO 301 OF 2012

STAY ORDER NO. 77 OF 2012

APPEAL NOS. ST/476 OF 2009, 432 & 1589 OF 2010

ST/STAY/260 OF 2010

MAY 14, 2012

ORDER

P.G. Chacko, Judicial Member

The appeals, ST/476/2009 and ST/1589/2010, were filed by M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. – V. Satya Murthy Joint Venture (hereinafter referred to as Ramky-Murthy JV) and the third appeal, ST/432/2010, was filed by M/s. Maytas Infra Ltd.-Nagarjuna Construction Company Ltd. Joint Venture (hereinafter referred to as Maytas- NCC JV). All the three appeals are directed principally against demands of service tax under the head “Works Contract Service” confirmed against them by the Commissioner in adjudication of the relevant show-cause notices covering various periods as shown below:-

Appeal No. Date of SCN Period of dispute OIO No. & date S. Tax + Education Cess Penalty imposed u/s 76 Penalty imposed u/s 77 Penalty imposed u/s 78
ST/476/2009 24/10/2008 June 2007 to May 2008 No.14/2009-ST dt. 17/2/2009 Rs.2,79,12,913/- @2% of service tax per month Rs. 1000/- Rs.2.8 crores
ST/1589/2010 25/08/2009 June 2008 to March 2009 No.15/2010-ST dt. 29/3/2010 Rs.2,57,97,663/- @2% of service tax per month Rs. 5000/-
ST/432/2010 18/06/2009 June 2007 to Sept 2008 No.51/2009-ST dt. 30/11/2009 Rs.13,46,28,909/- @2% of service tax per month Rs. 1000/- Rs.14 crores

2. Facts of appeal No.ST/476/2009

2.1 From the results of investigations into the works undertaken by the appellant in execution of certain contracts awarded by the Irrigation & Command Area Development (CAD) Department, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, it appeared to the Anti-Evasion Wing of the Commissionerate of Service Tax, Hyderabad-II that the appellant was providing to the State Government “works contract service” (WCS) in terms of Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994 during the period from 01/06/2007 to 31/05/2008. It was found that six EPC contracts had been executed by the appellant for the Irrigation & CAD Department of the State Government during the said period. The relevant particulars including the description/scope of the work, as gathered by the service tax authorities, are as stated hereunder:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.