Follow Us :

A Knight in Shining Armor against Opportunist Takeover OR Capitulation for Growth

The Government of India revised the Foreign Investment Policy foreseeing the threat of opportunistic takeovers due to the COVID-19. Knight Shield against Opportunist Takeover, ‘a non-resident entity can invest in India, subject to the FDI Policy except in those sectors/activities which are prohibited. However, an entity of a country, which shares land border with India or where the beneficial owner of an investment into India is situated in or is a citizen of any such country, can invest only under the Government route. Further, a citizen of Pakistan or an entity incorporated in Pakistan can invest, only under the Government route, in sectors/activities other than defence, space, atomic energy and sectors/activities prohibited for foreign investment’.

Interpretation of Knight Shield against Opportunist Takeover:

1. An entity situated in a country which shares a land border with India, or any person who is a beneficial owner of investment into India, and is situated in or is a citizen of any such Bordering Country, can invest in India (except in sectors/activities prohibited for foreign investment) only with prior Government approval.

2. Also, transfer of ownership in any existing or future FDI in an Indian entity, whether directly or indirectly, which results in the beneficial ownership falling in the hands of entities/citizens of countries, which share a border with India, shall also require prior Government approval.

The issue may turn out to be a double-edged sword:

1. Concept of Beneficial Owner or Control not defined.

2. The clarity for Right Issue subscriptions.

3. Disinvestment norms.

4. Guided principles on Foreign Portfolio Investments.

5. Treatment of Special Administrative Region.

Conclusion

These issues need to address with the utmost wisdom, to overcome any unforeseen situation that may creep up, considering the financial position and growth of aspects of Our Country.

Disclaimer- The information contained in this article is only for information purposes. Any views or opinions represented in this article are personal and belong solely to the author. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information or found by following any link. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Do not act based on anything you might read in this article. This article is purely for informative and educative purpose.

Author Bio

A young enthusiastic lawyer and being an qualified Company secretary and CIA+, having experience in managing legal aspects of organization mergers, joint ventures, funds, and acquisitions. Extensive knowledge of corporate and contract law, M&A transactions. Proficient with corporate banking, par View Full Profile

My Published Posts

IBC: Adjudicatory Attempt to Step into the Shoes of Regulatory Gift is no exception to specific prohibition |Transfer of Property Act, 1882 IBC 2016 | Position of Sole Proprietorship is still up in the air Companies (Compromise Arrangements & Amalgamations) Amendment Rules or Majority Rule? NI Act: No mandatory requirement of notice to directors of Company View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031