Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Control and Switch gear Contractors Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA 290/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case:

New Delhi court held in PR. CIT Vs Control and Switch gear Contractors Ltd that if the assessee had disclosed the income in its return of income though wrongly disclosed it did not mean that the assessee had tried to hide its income so that wrongly disclosed income could not be considered as an undisclosed income and penalty u/s 271(1)( C) could not be levied.

Moreover as the assessee had consulted its tax advisor and acted accordingly so it meant that the intention of assesssee was not to hide the income so penalty u/s 271(1)( C) could not be levied

Facts of the case:

The assessee had given up its rights and received compensation, the Company has entered into a JV

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031