Article explains Why Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, Benefits of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, Applicability of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, Disputes Covered under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, Eligibility Conditions for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, Exclusions under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, SALIENT FEATURES, PAYMENT TERMS of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, What is Disputed tax under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, What is Disputed interest under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, What is Disputed Penalty under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, What is Disputed fee under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, Procedures Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Other Features of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.
To reduce the disputed tax demand pending before appellate authorities i.e. CIT(A), ITAT, High Court and Supreme Court.
To generate timely revenue.
To save the time, energy and resources of tax payer as well as Government of India.
In case of all pending appeals before CIT(A), ITAT, High Court and Supreme Court as on 31st January, 2020.
All disputes, subject to some exclusion, in relation to the-
# Appeals/writs filed on or before 31.01.2020 and pending.
# Orders for which time for filing appeal has not expired on 31.01.2020
# Case pending before Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) on 31.01.2020
# Cases where DRP issued direction on or before 31.01.2020 but no order has been passed.
# Cases where assessee filed revision (Section 264) on or before 31.01.2020.
# Search case if the disputed demand is less than Rs. 5 Crore for a particular financial year.
# The appeals/writs filed by the taxpayers or the department.
# Disputes where the payment has already been made shall also be eligible.
# Cases in arbitration in India or Abroad.
|Payment made on or before||Appeal relates to disputed tax||Appeal relates only
to disputed penalty
or interest or fee
|31st March 2020||100% of the disputed tax (125% in search cases)||25% of the disputed penalty or interest or fee|
(30th June 2020)
|110% of the disputed tax (135% in search cases) such that it does not increase total demand||30% of the disputed penalty or interest or fee|
|If an issue in taxpayer’s pending appeal already decided in his favour by appellate forum or if Department has filed appeal on an issue, amount payable is 50% of aforesaid amounts.|
“disputed tax”, in relation to an assessment year or financial year, as the case may be, means the income-tax, including surcharge and cess (hereafter in this clause referred to as the amount of tax) payable by the appellant under the provisions of the Income tax Act, 1961, as computed hereunder:-
(A) in a case where any appeal, writ petition or special leave petition is pending before the appellate forum as on the specified date,
(B) in a case where an order in an appeal or in writ petition has been passed by the appellate forum on or before the specified date,
(C) in a case where the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer on or before the specified date, and the time for filing appeal against such order has not expired as on that date,
(D) in a case where objection filed by the appellant is pending before the Dispute Resolution Panel under section 144C of the Income-tax Act as on the specified date,
(E) in a case where Dispute Resolution Panel has issued any direction under sub-section (5) of section 144C of the Income-tax Act and the Assessing Officer has not passed the order under sub-section (13) of that section on or before the specified date,
(F) in a case where an application for revision under section 264 of the Income-tax Act is pending as on the specified date, the amount of tax payable by the appellant if such application for revision was not to be accepted:
> Provided that in a case where Commissioner (Appeals) has issued notice of enhancement under section 251 of the Income tax Act on or before the specified date,
> the disputed tax shall be increased by the amount of tax pertaining to issues for which notice of enhancement has been issued:
> Provided further that in a case where the dispute in relation to an assessment year relates to reduction of tax credit under section 115JAA or section 115D of the Income-tax Act or any loss or depreciation computed thereunder,
> the appellant shall have an option either to include the amount of tax related to such tax credit or loss or depreciation in the amount of disputed tax,or to carry forward the reduced tax credit or loss or depreciation, in such manner as may be prescribed.
“Disputed interest“means the interest determined in any case under the provisions of the Income tax Act, 1961, where—
> such interest is not charged or chargeable on disputed tax;
> an appeal has been filed by the appellant in respect of such interest;
> It covers those cases wherein the assessee is not disputing quantum addition but calculation of interest u/s 234B etc.
“Disputed Penalty” means the penalty determined in any case under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where—
“Disputed fee” means the fee determined under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of which appeal has been filed by the appellant.
# Taxpayer to file declaration in specified form before the designated authority.
# Taxpayer to furnish an undertaking waiving his right direct or indirect to seek or pursue any remedy or claim in relation to the tax arrears under any law.
# Designated authority within 15 days from the date of receipt of declaration to determine the amount payable by the Taxpayer and grant a certificate to the declarant containing particulars of tax arrears and amount payable in prescribed form
# Upon filing of the declaration, the appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate U/s 5(1)
# The taxpayer would be required to submit the proof of withdrawal of appeal / writ with the intimation of payment i.e. before the issuance of final certificate for settling dispute and not with the declaration
# Taxpayer to pay the amount determined by the designated authority within 15 days from the date of receipt of the certificate and inform the designated authority of such payment made in prescribed form
# Order passed under Section 5(1) by the designated authority to be conclusive as to matters mentioned therein and such matters cannot be reopened in any other proceedings.
# No institution of any proceedings in respect of an offence, penalty or interest. [Section 6] (For the benefit of declarant)
# Appellate forums / arbitrator, conciliator or mediator not to decide the issue in respect of cases where an order under clause 5(1) is passed by the designated authority. [Section 4(7)]
Refund of Excess Amount: If the amount paid by the taxpayer before filing declaration exceeds the amount payable under the Scheme, he would be granted the refund for such excess amount.
No Refund: Any amount paid in pursuance of the scheme shall not be refundable under any circumstances.
Removal of Difficulty: The Central Government may by order not inconsistent with the provisions of the scheme remove the difficulty.
If there are more than one issues involved in the appeal, the taxpayer would be required to file declaration for all issues, he cannot file declaration for some issues and litigate the balance issues.
In a case where the taxpayer has got a favourable decision on an issue at higher forum, he would be required to pay only 50% of disputed tax on that issue even in the cases in which he has filed appeal.
The taxpayer would be required to submit the proof of withdrawal of appeal/writ with the intimation of payment i.e. before the issuance of final certificate for setting dispute and not with the declaration as originally proposed in the Bill. The department would also withdraw the appeal/writ before the issuance of final certificate for setting dispute.
In case where the Assessing Officer has reduced the returned loss by making addition of income/disallowing expenditure, the taxpayer shall have an option to either pay the notional tax on amount by which the loss has been reduced and carry forward the claimed loss without reduction or by accepting the reduced carry forward of loss without making any payment under the Scheme. Same mechanism would apply for reduction in MAT credit.
The setting of dispute regarding transfer pricing adjustment would not have any effect on the secondary adjustment, both being independent provisions, and the taxpayer would be required to repatriate found to India in respect of settled transfer pricing adjustment.
The revised Scheme now provides that filing of declaration will not set any precedence and it cannot be claimed in any other proceedings that the taxpayer or the Department has conceded its tax position by settling the dispute.