Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Yogesh Jashubhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Yogesh Jashubhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Mere difference in valuation or estimation does not constitute concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Ahmedabad ITAT allowed both the quantum &  penalty appeals of Assessee, holding that the delay in filing appeal was bona fide &  that the addition to Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) was unsustainable in law. Assessee, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), sold his share in agricultural land &  declared LTCG of ₹1.56 lakh, adopting cost of acquisition at ₹1.25 lakh (as on 01.04.1981) based on a registered valuer’s report. A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031