Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Yogesh Jashubhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Yogesh Jashubhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Mere difference in valuation or estimation does not constitute concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Ahmedabad ITAT allowed both the quantum &  penalty appeals of Assessee, holding that the delay in filing appeal was bona fide &  that the addition to Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) was unsustainable in law. Assessee, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), sold his share in agricultural land &  declared LTCG of ₹1.56 lakh, adopting cost of acquisition at ₹1.25 lakh (as on 01.04.1981) based on a registered valuer’s report. A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Complianc U/s 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031