Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Klin Industries Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Klin Industries Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot) Defective Penalty Notice Vitiates 271(1)(c) Proceedings – ITAT Rajkot Deletes Penalty Despite AMT Liability The Rajkot Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted penalty of ₹6.21 lakhs levied u/s 271(1)(c) for AY 2014-15, holding that the penalty notice was defective and the proceedings were invalid in law. The assessee had originally filed a nil return claiming deduction u/s 80JJA. The case was later reopened and assessed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 by bringing the income to tax under the AMT provisions of section 115JC, followed by levy of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930