Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M. Abdul Rehuman Kunju Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal Nos. 50 & 63 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

HIGH COURT OF KERALA

M. Abdul Rehuman Kunju

versus

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-I, Kollam

I T Appeal Nos. 50 & 63 of 2012

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. vswami says:

    On the first blush, to say the least, in one’s conviction,there is a certain difficulty or inescapable mental block in reaily reconciling the view the HC has taken, with the applicable principles of interpretation to be gathered from case law on issues founded on any such ‘retrospective amendment of law’.In particular,the two limbs of the concluding observations,which read as under, –

    “We would then be stepping out of and beyond the scope of the jurisdiction under Section 260A. The assessee too has not raised such a question in the appeal.”-

    are not quite understood.

    May be, prima facie,the HC’s ruling itself gives rise to a ‘substabtial question of law’; hence,one will be obliged to wait for the final outcome of the inevitable further proceedings.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031