Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Tarun Sales (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs Tarun Sales (ITAT Delhi)

Since no dealer or sub-dealer was appointed either by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL) or by the assessee, for the purpose of marketing the products and/or service of the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., the entire sales were to customers, either directly or through shopkeepers, who rendered services to the customers. Moreover, the entire sales were in cash. No commission was paid by the assessee to the customers. Then, Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Balvinder Kumar Sharma says:

    HEADING OF CASE LAW ON SECTION 194H IS MISLEADING AND CONTRARY TO THE RATIO DECIDENDI. SECTION 194H IS NOT ATTRACTED ON PRINCIPAL TO PRINCIPAL DEALINGS.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31