Any person (not being an individual/HUF*), responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than interest on securities, is responsible to deduct TDS under section 194A and deposit the same to the Government Treasury within the time stipulated. The recipient of the income (though he/she gets only the net amount after TDS) is liable to tax on the gross amount. The amount deducted is adjusted against her/his final tax liability.
*However, the provisions of section 194A related to TDS on Interest other than Interest on Securities shall be applicable to individuals/HUFs, whose total sales, turnover or gross receipts from the business/profession carried on by him/her exceed the monetary limits specified u/s 44AB during the financial year (FY) immediately preceding the FY in which the income is to be credited/paid. Monetary limit (at present) in case of business is turnover of Rs.1 crore and in case of profession, gross receipts of Rs.25 lacs. (this limit has been increased to Rs 50 Lakhs wef A.y 2017-18)
|Particulars||194A – TDS on Interest (other than Interest on Securities)|
|Who is responsible for tax deduction (payer)?||Any person paying interest other than interest on securities|
|Who is the recipient?||A resident person|
|What is the nature of payment covered?||Interest other than interest on securities|
|When is tax to be deducted?||At the time of credit or payment, whichever is earlier|
|What is the rate of tax deduction?||i) 10%
ii) 20% (if no PAN is furnished)
|When is tax not deductible (threshold limit)?||Tax not deductible if payment/credit does not exceed- Rs. 10,000 in case of bank interest, co-operative bank interest, interest on senior citizen savings scheme (SCSS). However this limit has been increased to Rs 50,000 wef 1st April 2018 in case the payee is senior citizen.
– Rs.5,000 in any other case
|When are the provisions not applicable?||Tax is not deductible in some cases (explained below)|
|Is tax deductible at lower rate?||Yes (explained below)|
TDS under section 194A is not deductible where the aggregate amount of interest credited/paid (or likely to be credited/paid) during the FY does not exceed the amount given below:
|Payer||Threshold limit (Rs.)||Threshold limit (Rs.) for Senior Citizen wef 01.04.2018|
|Banking company (on time deposit)||10,000||50,000|
|Co-operative society carrying on banking business (on time deposit)||10,000||50,000|
|Post office (on SCSS)||10,000||50,000|
|Any other person||5,000||5,000|
Until 31st May, 2015, the threshold limit was computed with reference to the income credited/paid by a branch of the banking company or co-operative society, as applicable.
W.e.f. 1st June 2015, the computation of interest income for the purposes of deduction of tax under section 194A should be made with reference to the income credited/paid by the banking company or the co-operative society or the public company (i.e. all branches) which has adopted core banking solutions.
By virtue of sections 194A(3) and 197(1C), tax u/s 194A is not deductible in the following cases:
1) The aggregate amount of interest credited/paid (or likely to be credited/paid) during the FY does not exceed the specified threshold limit.
2) Interest is paid/credited to any banking company, co-operative bank, public financial institutions, LIC, UTI, an insurance company, co-operative society carrying the business of insurance or notified institutions.
3) Interest is paid/credited by the firm to its partner(s).
4) Interest is paid/credited by co-operative society (other than co-operative bank wef 1st June,2015)to its members [i.e. interest on time deposits /other deposits) to members holding one share] or to any other co-operative society.
Time deposits shall include recurring deposits within its scope for the purposes of deduction of tax under section 194A. However, the existing threshold limit of Rs.10,000 for non-deduction of tax shall also be applicable in case of interest payment on recurring deposits to safeguard interests of small depositors.
5) Interest is paid/credited in respect of deposits under the schemes of Post Office (Time Deposits), Post Office (Recurring Deposits), Post Office Monthly Income A/c, Kisan Vikas Patra, NSC VIII Issue, Indira Vikas Patra.
6) Interest is paid/credited on deposits (other than time deposit made on/after July 1, 1995) with a banking company or interest paid/credited to non-members on deposit with a co-operative bank.
7) Interest paid/credited in respect of deposits (by non-members) with a primary agricultural credit society or primary credit society or co-operative land mortgage bank or co-operative land development bank.
8) Interest paid/credited by Central Govt under different provisions of Direct Taxes.
9) Interest paid/credited on compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal if the aggregate amount does not exceed Rs.50,000. Threshold limit of Rs.50,000 is applicable separately where interest is to be shared by 2 or more claimants – National Insurance Co. Ltd Vs Draupadibai  11 Taxmann.com 65 (MP). W.e.f. 1st June 2015, deduction of tax u/s 194A from interest payment on the compensation amount awarded by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal shall be made only at the time of payment, if the amount of such payment or aggregate amount of such payments during the FY exceeds Rs.50,000.
10) Income paid/payable by an infrastructure capital company/fund or public sector company in relation to zero coupon bonds.
11) Interest paid/payable by an Offshore Banking Unit on deposits made (or borrowings) on/after Apr 1, 2005, by a person who is resident but not ordinarily resident in India
12) Interest referred to in section 10(23FC).
If a declaration is submitted u/s 197A by the recipient to the payer along with his/her PAN, then no tax is deductible if the following conditions are satisfied:
1) Recipient is a person other than a company/firm
2) Tax on total income of the previous year (PY) is nil
3) Total income does not exceed the exemption limit (i.e. for AY 2019-20, Rs.2,50,000 or Rs.3,00,000 or Rs.5,00,000, as applicable). This condition is not applicable if the recipient is a resident senior citizen.
Such a declaration shall be given in duplicate in form 15G (15H for senior citizens). In case of Senior Citizens Saving Scheme, 2004 (SCSS), investors can submit the declaration. Nominees of investors of SCSS can also produce the declaration at the time of payment after the death of the depositor. On submission of declaration to the bank, bank shall not deduct tax (subject to the conditions) on payment of interest.
As per provisions of section 197, the recipient can apply in form no.13 to the Assessing Officer to get a certificate authorizing the payer to deduct tax at lower rate (or deduct no tax, if certain conditions are satisfied). There is no time limit for application and it can be filed at any time before actual deduction of tax. If the recipient does not have PAN, he cannot apply for the certificate.
The certificate shall be issued, directly to the person responsible for paying income, on a plain paper, under an advice to the applicant. The certificate cannot be issued with retrospective effect. The recipient may furnish copy of such certificate to the person responsible for paying the income for lower/no deduction of tax at source.
In case of deposit in joint names, where there is no definite information about the share of deposit holders, the payer of interest may aggregate the interest in the joint account of the holder who has higher interest income – Circular No.256 dated May 29, 1979.
For example, There is a deposit of Rs.7,000 in a joint account of XY (definite share unknown) and also there are deposits of Rs.45,000 in the name of X and Rs.3,000 in the name of Y with same person and ROI being 10%. The payer of interest may aggregate the interest of Rs.700 (7000 @10%) with the interest of Rs.4500 (45000 @10%) on deposit of X (as X has higher interest income). If the interest income exceeds the threshold limit, the payer shall deduct tax at source @10%.
On the other hand, if the payer has definite information about the share of joint deposit, then the proportionate interest income from joint deposit will be added to the separate interest income of each of the deposit holders – Circular No.256 dated May 29, 1979.
In the same example, if both the holders have equal share, then Rs.350 (7000 x 10% @50%) will be added to the interest income of each of the holders. If the interest income exceeds the threshold limit (separate for each of the holders), the payer shall deduct tax at source @10%.
Interest payment made under the Land Acquisition Act shall be subject to the provisions of sec 194A – Circular No. 526 dated Dec 5, 1988.
However, interest payable on delayed compensation for compulsory acquisition shall not be subject to tax deduction at source – Bikram Singh Vs Land Acquisition Collector  89 Taxman 119.
Where one (or more) litigant is directed by the court that a specified amount be deposited in the bank directly or through the court, the bank shall deduct tax at source on the interest accruing on such deposit as per provisions of sec 194A. TDS certificate (form 16A) shall be issued by the bank in the name of the depositor(s). Where more than one person has been directed to deposit any specified amount, tax at source shall be deducted on proportionate interest accrued to each of the respective depositor (if it exceeds threshold limit) and TDS certificates shall be issued accordingly – Circular No.8/2011 dated Oct 14, 2011.
However, once the court decides the ownership of money lying in fixed deposit , the provision of section 194A shall apply to recipient of the income-Circular No.23/2015 dated Oct 28, 2015.
For instance, in the course of appellate proceedings, the court directs an insurance company to make a term deposit of a part of compensation awarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The credit of TDS on interest accruing on such deposit will be allowed to the insurance company which has made such deposit.
These provisions shall not be applicable in the following cases:
In case of outstation sale of goods, the supplier draws a hundi (indigenous bill of exchange) on buyer and routes it to through the banker along the relevant documents with instructions to deliver the documents on retirement of hundi and to charge interest on the amount of hundi from the date of acceptance to the date of actual payment. As the interest paid from the buyer is not from the bank as such but only routed through bank to the supplier (who is the recipient), the buyer has to deduct tax at source as per provisions of sec 194A – Circular No.48 dated Nov 7, 1970.
Tax is to be deducted at source even where such interest is paid under an arrangement whereby the commission agent retains for himself/herself the interest due to him/her at the time of paying to the consignor the moneys due to him/her on account of the consignment – Circular letter F No.12/12/68-IT(A-II) dated Sep 23, 1968.
Payment made by a company, engaged in retail finance services, corporate advisory services, securities trading and asset securitization, to the persons who has invested in a scheme floated by the company under which the investor is guaranteed a minimum return of 1.5% pm, the company is liable to deduct tax at source u/s 194A from payment of interest made to investors as above – Viswapriya Financial Services & Securities Ltd Vs CIT  258 ITR 496 (Mad).
Similarly, where the assessee has borrowed money from financiers for making payment to its suppliers and had paid financial charges to the financiers and debited the same under discounting charges, such discounting charges are in nature of interest and liable for tax deduction at source – Kanha Vanaspati Ltd Vs CIT  17 SOT 160 (Delhi).
Provisions of sec 194A are not applicable in case where a part of purchase instalment is paid by a hirer to the owner under a hire purchase contract – Instruction No.1425 dated Nov 16, 1981.
Provisions of sec 194A are not applicable in case of cheque discounting charges as such charges are different from interest payments – ITO Vs A S Babu Sah  86 ITD 283 (Mad).
Tax is to be deducted at source u/s 194A by an insurance company in case of interest on delayed payment of compensation awarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and trial court cannot direct insurance company to make payment without deduction of tax at source – New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs Mani  270 ITR 394 (Mad).
It has been held by Supreme Court in CIT Vs Century Building Industries P Ltd  163 Taxman 188, that where director’s personal loans were routed through the company’s books by back-to-back transactions/cheques, the company has an obligation to deduct tax at source u/s 194A on interest payment. It does not matter whether the company has only acted as a medium for collection and disbursement. The tax should be deducted at the time of credit notwithstanding the arrangement between the company, directors and the agency giving loan.
Discount distributed to subscribers of a chit fund in the form of bid amount offered by the successful bidder who takes chit is not interest and consequently, tax is not deductible at source u/s 194A – CIT Vs Sahib Chits (Delhi) P Ltd  185 Taxman 34 (Delhi), ITO Vs Daspalla Chits & Investments Ltd  4 ITR (Trib) 732 (Visakha).
Since no constructive credit to the depositor’s/payee’s account takes place while calculating interest on time deposits on daily/monthly basis in CBS software used by banks, tax need not be deducted at source u/s 194A on such provision of interest for macro monitoring. Tax shall be deducted at source on accrual of interest at the end of the FY or at periodic intervals or on maturity or on encashment, as applicable – Circular No.03/2010 dated Mar 2, 2010.
Judgment debtor is not liable to deduct tax at source on interest component of decree – Madhusudhan Shrikrishna Vs Emkay Exports  188 Taxman 195 (Bom).
Where an assessee utilizes unspent credit limit of another party and reimburses interest payable by the said party to the bank, the assessee is liable to deduct tax at source from such payment u/s 194A – Bhura Exports Ltd Vs ITO  13 Taxmann.com 162 (Cal).
Payments which have direct link and immediate nexus with the trading liability connected with the delayed purchase payments, will not fall within the meaning of interest and therefore, interest on delayed payment of purchase bills is not subject to tax deduction at source u/s 194A – Sri Venkatesh Paper Agencies (Hyd) P Ltd Vs CIT  24 Taxmann.com 52 (Hyd).
Loan processing fees falls within the definition of interest and the same would be liable to deduction of tax at source u/s 194A – Aban Investments P Ltd Vs CIT  52 SOT 36 (Chennai).
The supreme court has dismissed special leave petition against Delhi High Court’s decision in CIT Vs Cargil Global Trading P Ltd  11 Taxmann.com 219 wherein the High Court had held that discounting charges paid to get export sale bills discounted is not interest and does not attract TDS u/s 194A – CIT Vs Cargil Global Trading P Ltd  21 Taxmann.com 496 (SC). Thus provisions of sec 194A are not applicable for bill discounting charges.
(Republished With Amendments)