Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sarayu Krishna Kamat Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sarayu Krishna Kamat Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) For Section 56(2)(x), Stamp Duty Value as on Date of Allotment Applies When Consideration Paid Through Banking Channels The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of Sarayu Krishna Kamat for AY 2018–19, deleting an addition of ₹2,70,970 made under Section 56(2)(x) on account of alleged difference between purchase consideration and stamp duty value of a jointly purchased flat. The Tribunal noted that the assessee, along with her husband, had booked the flat in FY 2016–17 and was issued an allotment letter dated 21.04...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031