Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vasanthi Bijjala Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vasanthi Bijjala Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Registered Sale Deed Doesn’t Wipe Out Prior Cash Deal Indicators- Unsigned But Unignored: ITAT Upholds Addition Based on Stamped Seized Agreement Assessee filed return declaring income of Rs.6,77,340. Pursuant to search u/s 132 on Spectra Group, unsigned but stamped loose sheets showing a development agreement dated 31.12.2019 were seized. These recorded alleged cash payment of Rs.60 lakhs by the purchaser, with Assessee’s share at 3.51% (Rs.2,10,600). AO initiated proceedings u/s 153C, treated this amount as unexplained money u/s 69A r.w.s.115BBE ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031