This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 69C Addition Deleted: No 65B Certificate for Pen Drive Evidence; Third-Party Documents Insufficient – ITAT Hyderabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Ramesh Babu Segu (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ACIT Vs Ramesh Babu Segu (ITAT Hyderabad)
Addition u/s 69C Based on Seized Pen Drive Deleted – Digital Evidence Without Valid 65B Certificate Inadmissible – Third-Party Documents Cannot Sustain Addition – ITAT Hyderabad
Search in Polisetty Somasundaram Group led to issuance of notice u/s 153C to the assessee alleging cash payments of ₹1.10 crore based solely on data extracted from a seized pen drive and certain receipt copies. The AO treated the alleged payment as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. However, CIT(A) deleted the addition observing that the receipts did not relate to the rel...
Author Info
