This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 68 additions cannot be made merely on doubts, conjectures or surmises
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs. Ambika Metalchem Impex P. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs. Ambika Metalchem Impex P. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
In the present case, we find that the assessee has duly discharged the initial onus of proving the identity of the investors, creditworthiness of the transactions and genuineness of the transactions. Notices issued u/s 133(6) have been responded to. In such a scenario, the onus to dislodge the assessee’s claim, in our opinion, was shifted back to Ld. AO and he was duty bound to investigate the case further. However, the facts on record nowhere establishes that such further inquiries / investigations have subsequently been conducted by Ld. ...






