Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Income Tax
  3. Judiciary

No Section 56(2)(viib) Addition Required for Discrepancy of less than 10%

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sakshi Fincap Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts : All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sakshi Fincap Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Introduction

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi add

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy / Taxguru Edu
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Member Since: 27 Feb 2017 | Total Posts: 6898
A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Madras HC Upholds Income Tax Case Transfer to Kochi Central Circle Delhi HC Grants Time for Reply, Sets Aside “Cryptic” Ex-Parte GST Order Service of Notice on Old Email Address: ITAT Delhi Voids Reassessment Order Delhi HC condones Late GST Appeal, Notification Validity Pending SC Review Vague Grounds of Accommodation Entries: ITAT Quashes Tax Reassessment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates

Featured Posts

View All Featured Posts
Sponsored

Popular Posts

Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031