Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shinhan Bank (Erstwhile Chohung Bank) Vs The Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.6891/Mum/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/06/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2004-05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

It was held that what is covered u/s.44C is the expenditure that is common in nature meaning thereby that the benefit of the said expenditure is derived both by the Head Office and the Branch. It was held that payment of salary made in the case of the assessee was to expatriate employees who were working actually with the assessee in India though the payment was made to them by the Head Office outside India. It was held that the expenditure incurred on such payment thus was incurred exclusively for the branch in India and the same was not covered within the purview of sec.44C.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

 ITA No.6891/Mum/2007 – (Assessment Year: 2004-05) 

ITA No.551/Mum/2010 – (Assessment Year: 2005-06) 

ITA No.4191/Mum/2010 -(Assessment Year: 2006-07)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031