This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271(1)(b) not stipulate any penalty for not responding to section 148 notice
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Neeraj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11 & 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Neeraj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
From the penalty order, we observe that the Assessing Officer nowhere stated that the notices issued u/s 142(1) of the Act were served on the assessee. In the entire penalty order we observe that the notices said to have been issued by the AO but it is not the finding of the AO that anyone of such notices were served on the assessee. It is also the contention of the assessee that even notice u/s 148 said to have been issued by the AO was never served on the assessee and the appeal filed by the assessee is still pending before the Ld. CIT(A). We...






