Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 271(1)(b) not stipulate any penalty for not responding to section 148 notice

Case Law Details

Case Name
Neeraj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11 & 2012-13
Advertisement Neeraj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) From the penalty order, we observe that the Assessing Officer nowhere stated that the notices issued u/s 142(1) of the Act were served on the assessee. In the entire penalty order we observe that the notices said to have been issued by the AO but it is not the finding of the AO that anyone of such notices were served on the assessee. It is also the contention of the assessee that even notice u/s 148 said to have been issued by the AO was never served on the assessee and the appeal filed by the assessee is still pending before the Ld. CIT(A). We...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *