Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vineetsingh Gulabsingh Rore Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vineetsingh Gulabsingh Rore Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

AO failed to make adequate enquiries regarding large cash deposits during the demonetisation- PCIT’s 263 Order Upheld

In Vineetsingh Gulabsingh Rore v. PCIT, Ahmedabad-1 (ITA No. 868/Ahd/2023; AY 2017-18), the ITAT Ahmedabad Bench dealt with a challenge to a revisionary order passed under Section 263, along with a substantial Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Debatable MAT Computation Cannot Be Rectified Under Section 154 Section 263 Revision Quashed for Absence of Exempt Income Ex-Parte Appeal Dismissal Set Aside for Lack of Reasoned Order Reassessment Quashed as JAO Lacked Jurisdiction After Faceless Scheme Appeal Dismissed on Delay Remanded for Merits Despite Non-Compliance View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031