Section 179 Freezing bank accounts of director without issuing notice is invalid

K. Chandrasekaran Vs TRO (Madras High Court)

The present impugned order is put to challenge mainly on three grounds. The first ground raised is that the petitioner was not put on notice before passing the impugned order. When such contention is specifically raised by the petitioner, it is the duty of the respondent to place the material and satisfy this Court with regard to service of notice. No material is placed before this Court to substantiate the service of such notice to the petitioner, before passing the impugned orde

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.