Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Anagram Capital Ltd. (formerly known as Anagram Securities Ltd.) (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

This appeal is against restricting the addition to 6 lacs out of total addition Rs.44,42,330/- made u/s. 14A of the Act. The ld.Sr.DR vehemently argued that the ld.CIT(A) was not justified in restricting the addition. He placed reliance on the assessment order.

On the contrary, the ld.counsel for the assessee submitted that the AO made disallowance by invoking the provisions of section 14A of the Act and applying the Rule 8D of the IT Rules, 1962, but the assessment order is involved in this appeal is AY 2006-07 and, therefore

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. prakash d shah says:

    The judgement has not been properly understood,as in the cross appeal of the assessee,no part of interest has been disallowed by the Hon’ble ITAT.

  2. prakash d shah says:

    The judgement has not been properly,as in the cross appeal of the assessee,no part of interest has been disallowed by the Hon’ble ITAT.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31