Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Anagram Capital Ltd. (formerly known as Anagram Securities Ltd.) (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
This appeal is against restricting the addition to 6 lacs out of total addition Rs.44,42,330/- made u/s. 14A of the Act. The ld.Sr.DR vehemently argued that the ld.CIT(A) was not justified in restricting the addition. He placed reliance on the assessment order. On the contrary, the ld.counsel for the assessee submitted that the AO made disallowance by invoking the provisions of section 14A of the Act and applying the Rule 8D of the IT Rules, 1962, but the assessment order is involved in this appeal is AY 2006-07 and, therefore Rule 8D in this year is not applicable. He submitted that the inter...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. prakash d shah says:

    The judgement has not been properly understood,as in the cross appeal of the assessee,no part of interest has been disallowed by the Hon’ble ITAT.

  2. prakash d shah says:

    The judgement has not been properly,as in the cross appeal of the assessee,no part of interest has been disallowed by the Hon’ble ITAT.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930