Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Hari Orgochem Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The Assessing Officer made disallowance by invoking the provisions of Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules. As per assessee, the AO has not established any nexus between the expenditure disallowed and investment made from which the income denied is exempt from tax. Secondly, the AO has not recorded any proper satisfaction about the correctness of the claim in respect of such expenditure. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the assessment year under appeal being 2008-2009, therefore, any disallowance u/s. 14A would be in accordance with the method prescribed under Rule ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930