Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandanam Sangaih & Son Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandanam Sangaih & Son Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Section 148 Notice Dispatched After 01.04.2021 — Reassessment Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 148A The Visakhapatnam Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment for AY 2017–18 holding that the notice under Section 148, though dated 29.03.2021, was issued only on 08.04.2021, being the date of dispatch through speed post, and therefore governed by the post-Finance Act, 2021 reassessment regime. Relying on Kanubhai M. Patel (HUF) v. Hiren Bhatt, the Tribunal reiterated that the date of issuance is the date of handing over to posta...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930