Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs United Provinces Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs United Provinces Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) In this case, CPC passed intimation u/s 143(1) while processing return and disallowed carry forward of business loss ₹22.62 Cr and unabsorbed depreciation ₹31.68 Cr without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(1)(a). CIT(A) allowed assessee’s appeal holding adjustment void ab initio, which was affirmed by ITAT. The assessee had filed return for AY 2024-25 claiming refund after set-off of brought forward losses, and such losses were consistently accepted in earlier years’ intimations. However, CPC made adjustment without giving ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031