Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Venkatraman Jayashree Priyadharshini Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Venkatraman Jayashree Priyadharshini Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) Assessee, an individual, declared LTCG of ₹1.37 crore on sale of property & claimed deduction u/s 54. AO, however, computed LTCG at ₹2.87 crore, disallowing large part of claimed exemption. CIT(A) granted partial relief, restricting taxable LTCG to ₹2.01 crore, allowing cost of new flat at ₹88.85 lakh. Before Tribunal, Assessee contended that further costs incurred on making the new residential property habitable-such as interior works (wardrobes, modular kitchen, cupboards, painting, fittings, etc.) of ₹21 lakh supporte...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to SRIRAM CHEKURI

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930