Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : K.N. Subramaniam Vs PCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
K.N. Subramaniam Vs PCIT (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that Tax Recovery Officer is not required to declare the sale between the petitioner and the fourth respondent as invalid as the sale is void abinito. Thus, court directed petitioner to institute suit in a civil court to establish right over disputed property. Facts- The fourth respondent’s Return of Income Tax for A.Y. 2008-09 and A.Y. 2009-10 resulted in a demand of tax arrears for a sum of Rs.20,69,529/- along with interest u/s. 220(2) of Rs.41,390/- for A.Y. 2008-09 and a sum of Rs.16,21,470/- along with interest u/s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930