Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Bhikhubhai Padsala Vs. ITO & Anr. (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandip Bhikhubhai Padsala Vs. ITO & Anr. (Gujarat High Court) It is submitted that as such the petitioner – assessee did not claim interest under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, and therefore, there was no question of reopening of the assessment on the aforesaid ground. it is an admitted position that the petitioner – assessee did not claim any interest under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, and therefore, on the aforesaid ground the assessing officer is not justified in reopening the assessment. No exemption under section 10(38) could be allowed in respect of capital...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930