Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Bhikhubhai Padsala Vs. ITO & Anr. (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 17223 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/11/2016
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sandip Bhikhubhai Padsala Vs. ITO & Anr. (Gujarat High Court)

It is submitted that as such the petitioner – assessee did not claim interest under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, and therefore, there was no question of reopening of the assessment on the aforesaid ground.

it is an admitted position that the petitioner – assessee did not claim any interest under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, and therefore, on the aforesaid ground the assessing officer is not justified in reopening the assessment.

No exemption under section 10(38) could be allowed in respect of capital gains arising on sale of shares held for less than 12 months period.

The claim of assessee that shares were purchased on 2-6-2007 was not tenable. It was required to be treated as purchase on 2-12-2010 for 90,000 and on 16-3-2011 for 2,20,000 shares as evident from the d-mat account. As such, period of holding was less than 12 months, the assessee was not entitled of exemption under section 10(38) of the Act and liable to tax under section 111A.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031