This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Refusal To Give 30 Days For Tax Payment Is High-handed & Unlawful – HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Firoz Tin Factory and another. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Advertisement
In the present case, as noted earlier, a provisional attachment has already been levied on 7 October 2011 under Section 281B by which the amount which was invested by the Assessee in mutual funds of SBI Mutual Funds was attached. The attachment was to the extent of Rs.36.54 Crores. That being the position evidently there would have been no basis for forming a reason to believe that if the period of 30 days was to be observed under Section 220(1), that would be detrimental to the Revenue.
Merely because the end of the financial year is approaching that cannot constitute a detri...
