Case Law Details
Case Name : Nakamichi Securities Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Kolkata
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rebate under section 88E was to be allowed from the tax computed as per provisions of section 115JB to find out whether after set off of rebate under section 88E, any tax liability remained or not. Admittedly the tax liability as per MAT provisions was Rs.7,56,694/- and rebate admissible under section 88E was Rs.26,98,260/-. Therefore, in any view of the matter, no prejudice was caused to the revenue by non-consideration of provisions of section 115JB by Assessing Officer. Therefore, ld. CIT’s order cannot be sustained.
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,KOLKATA
I .T.A. No. : 342/ Kol . / 2012 &#...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
I am looking for the High Court Judgement in Horizon Capital Ltd which was decided after the ITAT decision in its case of ITA No 592(Bng)/10.
Another similar case was DCIT v/s MBL & Co Ltd wherein again the High Court has decided this issue of Sec 88E and 115JB