Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krishnareddy Venkatesan Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Krishnareddy Venkatesan Vs ITO (Madras High Court)

The petitioner received a notice dated 21.03.2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging that during the financial year 2014–2015 (assessment year 2015–2016), cash deposits of ₹25,90,000 and a time deposit of ₹27,00,614 were made. In response, the petitioner submitted that the cash deposits of ₹25,90,000 were used to create the fixed deposit of ₹27,00,614. On this basis, it was contended that the threshold of ₹50,00,000 was not crossed and, therefore, the notice was barred by limitation under Sect

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031