Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krishnareddy Venkatesan Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Krishnareddy Venkatesan Vs ITO (Madras High Court) The petitioner received a notice dated 21.03.2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging that during the financial year 2014–2015 (assessment year 2015–2016), cash deposits of ₹25,90,000 and a time deposit of ₹27,00,614 were made. In response, the petitioner submitted that the cash deposits of ₹25,90,000 were used to create the fixed deposit of ₹27,00,614. On this basis, it was contended that the threshold of ₹50,00,000 was not crossed and, therefore, the notice was barred by limitation under Section 149(2)(v...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930