Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sanjeev Agrawal HUF (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18 & 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Sanjeev Agrawal HUF (ITAT Delhi) Penny Stock Allegation Fails – ITAT Delhi upholds Exemption on LTCG Revenue’s appeals arose from reassessment orders u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) wherein AO treated Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) of ₹1.25 crore earned by Sanjeev Agrawal HUF on sale of 3.63 lakh shares of Capital Trade Link Ltd. as bogus accommodation entry, denying exemption u/s 10(38) & making further addition of unexplained commission u/s 69C. Assessee demonstrated that shares were purchased through banking channels, dematerialised in DMAT, & subsequently sold through registered...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930