This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty proceedings initiated after 6 months from receipt of Adjudicatory Order is time barred
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Salora International Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Salora International Ltd. Vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
A plain and textual reading of Section 275(1A) clarifies that the expiry of six months prescribed is to be reckoned from the date of completion of proceedings or from the end of the month in which the order of the CIT(A) or as the case may be the appellate tribunal is received. If the logic of the provision is kept in mind, it is obviously an adjudicatory “order” which culminates in “the proceedings” terminus (i.e. an order that determines inter alia the rights of the parties finally) that is to be deemed a terminus quo for the comp...
