Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saurabh Bansal Vs. ITO (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
 Penalty is leviable within meaning of Explanation 1(B) to section 271(1)(c) in respect of alleged gifts received by minor sons of assessee which are finally found transferred to assessee’s books ITAT AHMEDABAD BENCH “D”, Saurabh Bansal Vs. ITO, APPEAL NO: ITA No. 351/Ahd/2008, DECIDED ON June 25, 2010 ORDER Per D. C. Agrawal, Accountant Member. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A) in which he has confirmed the penalty of Rs.2,08,380/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee raised following ground :- 1. On the fac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930