Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs M/s Mukta Metal Works (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 22 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/02/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) Versus M/s Mukta Metal Works (High Court Of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh) Whether the Tribunal is right in holding at page 68 of the order that the office note dated 21.05.2001 which was appended to 158BC order dated 21.5.2001 and is part of the said order, does not constitute a satisfaction note within the parameter of Section 158 BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of the person who has borrowed money through the assessee broker who is the searched person for the purpose of order U/s 158 BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

I.T.A. No. 22 of 2008 Date of decision: 28.2.2011

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031