This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Office notice appended to 158BC order can constitute satisfaction note within the parameter of Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs M/s Mukta Metal Works (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Punjab and Haryana HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) Versus M/s Mukta Metal Works (High Court Of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh) – Whether the Tribunal is right in holding at page 68 of the order that the office note dated 21.05.2001 which was appended to 158BC order dated 21.5.2001 and is part of the said order, does not constitute a satisfaction note within the parameter of Section 158 BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of the person who has borrowed money through the assessee broker who is the searched person for the purpose of order U/s 158 BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
...
