Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adarsh Developers Vs DCIT (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Adarsh Developers Vs DCIT (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High Court held that scrutiny notice issued u/s 143(2) by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) instead of jurisdictional Assessing Officer under Central Charge is sustainable in law and hence valid. Facts- The petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in the business of real estate development. The petitioner’s case is that its jurisdictional Assessing Officer is the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(1), Bangalore [the first respondent] and as such, the Additiona...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930