Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Shambhu Dayal Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 1998-99, 1999-2000 & 2000-2001
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Shambhu Dayal Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Since all the details were duly provided by the assessee there is no concealment and hence penalty under section 271 (1) (c) cannot be levied.

FACTS –

AO made addition on account of unexplained bank loans/deposits. AO also initiated penalty proceedings under section 271 (1) (c) for concealment of income. However, assessee duly provided all the particulars with regard to bank deposit like the source of income, c

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31