Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Shambhu Dayal Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 1998-99, 1999-2000 & 2000-2001
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri Shambhu Dayal Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Since all the details were duly provided by the assessee there is no concealment and hence penalty under section 271 (1) (c) cannot be levied. FACTS – AO made addition on account of unexplained bank loans/deposits. AO also initiated penalty proceedings under section 271 (1) (c) for concealment of income. However, assessee duly provided all the particulars with regard to bank deposit like the source of income, copies of agreement etc. Assessee clearly stated that the contended amount was received as advance from various parties against proposed s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930