Case Law Details
Case Name : Usha Holdings LL.C. & Anr. Vs Francorp Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Usha Holdings LL.C. & Anr. Vs Francorp Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi)
Conclusion –
- The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal concluded that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is not a ‘Court’ or a ‘Tribunal’ and hence cannot decide legality of a foreign decree. NCLAT held that deciding the legality or illegality of a foreign decree is outside the jurisdiction of NCLT.
- The appellant does not come within the meaning of ‘operational d
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
To recall : For the proposition, in general, why ‘Tribunal’ is not a ‘court’, and could never be a sustitute to ‘court’, ‘in its legal connotation, for a detailed judicial opion see SC Judgment in –
Madras Bar Association vs Union Of India & Anr.
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/181443842/