Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subha Singhvi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A .No.691/Del/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief Facts:

1. The assessee is an individual, who earned rental income from certain properties and claimed deduction for interest on loan paid by the assessee as interest u/s 24(b)of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2. The A.O., on perusal of interest certificate given by the bank, noticed that out the total interest of Rs. 29,89,223/-, an amount of Rs. 4,30,008/- was paid by the assessee as foreclosure charges on prepayment of loan to the Bank.

3. The AO did not allow deduction for this sum in the computation of income under the head ‘Income from house property.’

4. The ld. CIT(A) affirmed the view taken by the AO.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. ARVIND GUPTA says:

    I had taken Home loan & enjoying IT benefits.I also taken Mortgage Loan from same bank.

    Please clarify whether both loan are eligible for be deduction for interest u/s 24(b)of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031