Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Late Ramasamy Pongianna Gounder Desamani Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Late Ramasamy Pongianna Gounder Desamani Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Assessee filed his return declaring income of ₹4,16,100. The case was reopened u/s 147 on 27.03.2018 & return was again filed declaring the same income. AO noticed that M/s Cheran Spinners Ltd. had advanced ₹10.38 crore as loan to M/s Best Cheran Spintex India Ltd. in which  Assessee was a significant shareholder. AO held that since Assessee held 23.69% shares in the lending company (Cheran Spinners Ltd.) &  17.28% shares in the borrowing company (Best Cheran Spintex India Ltd.), the proportionate amount of loan of â‚...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930