Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Late Ramasamy Pongianna Gounder Desamani Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Late Ramasamy Pongianna Gounder Desamani Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Assessee filed his return declaring income of ₹4,16,100. The case was reopened u/s 147 on 27.03.2018 & return was again filed declaring the same income. AO noticed that M/s Cheran Spinners Ltd. had advanced ₹10.38 crore as loan to M/s Best Cheran Spintex India Ltd. in which  Assessee was a significant shareholder. AO held that since Assessee held 23.69% shares in the lending company (Cheran Spinners Ltd.) &  17.28% shares in the borrowing company (Best Cheran Spintex India Ltd.), the proportionate amount of loan of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930