Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : D.C.I.T. Vs M/s. Kothari Metals Ltd., (Kolkata ITAT)
Appeal Number : W.T.A Nos. 41/Kol/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/07/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Kanhaiya Kumar Agarwal

Brief Facts of the Case and Question of Law:

Brief Facts

The Assessing Officer while computing the total wealth of the assessee added the value of the let-out properties i.e. godown and offices in the total wealth of the assessee for the purpose of calculating the wealth-tax. The assessee claimed that the let-out properties are not assets within the meaning of section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act. The Assessing Officer did not agree. The assessee went in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) and the CIT(Appeals) deleted the addition after verifying and noting that the assessee has given the factory building/ godown building on rent. This fact has not been denied by the Revenue.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031