Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sukhbir Singh Chabra HUF (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Sukhbir Singh Chabra HUF (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Upholds 44AE Presumptive Income — Rejects Revenue’s Allegation of Tax Evasion in Related-Party Transport Business The Revenue appealed against the order of CIT(A)  deleting an addition of ₹1.69 crore made as unexplained income in the case of the Assessee-HUF engaged in truck transportation.  AO had alleged that  Assessee, a related party of ABC Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., was part of a group arrangement to divert profits using presumptive taxation u/s 44AE & 44AD. He treated 50% of receipts from the related concern (₹3.38 cro...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031