Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Karansinh Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Karansinh Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Additions on Demonetisation Cash Deposits — Retirement Benefits & Loan Repayment Held Genuine

Assessee, a retired government employee, appealed against CIT(A)’s order partly confirming addition u/s 69A towards unexplained credits & cash deposits totaling ₹31,90,289/-. AO had made a total addition of ₹50,94,553/- for unexplained deposits during the demonetisation period.

It was explained that the deposits came from legitimate sources such as gratuity, leave

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ex-Parte Order Quashed Due to Illness Preventing Timely Compliance Bogus Purchase Disallowance Held in Abeyance Due to HC Pending Cases Order Set Aside as CIT(A) Relied on Additional Evidence Without Remand Report Addition Deleted as Based Solely on Unverified Third-Party Information Without Evidence Linking Assessee Delayed Form 10B is Curable Procedural Lapse: ITAT Ahmedabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031