Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kumar Gaurav Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Kumar Gaurav Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

FTC Cannot Be Denied for Delay in Form 67: Directory, Not Mandatory- Form 67 Filed Before 143(1) Processing — Pune ITAT Orders FTC Allowance

Pune Tribunal dealt with denial of FTC of Rs.8,57,902 by CPC on ground that Form 67 was filed after due date u/s 139(1). Assessee, employed with Amazon India & later Amazon USA, offered global salary to tax & filed Form 67 on 26.02.2020, before filing ROI on 20.03.2020. AO processed return u/s 143(1) on 25.02.2021 but den

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 263 Revision Quashed for Absence of Exempt Income Ex-Parte Appeal Dismissal Set Aside for Lack of Reasoned Order Reassessment Quashed as JAO Lacked Jurisdiction After Faceless Scheme Appeal Dismissed on Delay Remanded for Merits Despite Non-Compliance Accepted Closing Cash Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031