Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kumar Gaurav Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Kumar Gaurav Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

FTC Cannot Be Denied for Delay in Form 67: Directory, Not Mandatory- Form 67 Filed Before 143(1) Processing — Pune ITAT Orders FTC Allowance

Pune Tribunal dealt with denial of FTC of Rs.8,57,902 by CPC on ground that Form 67 was filed after due date u/s 139(1). Assessee, employed with Amazon India & later Amazon USA, offered global salary to tax & filed Form 67 on 26.02.2020, before filing ROI on 20.03.2020. AO processed return u/s 143(1) on 25.02.2021 but den

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031