Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner Income Tax Vs Sri Ram Kishan Gupta (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 143 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/01/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In normal terminology, the share trading business on behalf of oneself is known as jobbing. Section 43(5) defines the word speculative transaction, but there are three exceptions to it. The proviso (c) to section 43(5) reads as under : ‘

‘A contract entered into by a member of forward market or a stock exchange in the course of any transaction in the nature of jobbing or arbitrage to hedge against loss which may arise in the ordinary course of his business as a member.’

This proviso makes it very clear that any profit or loss on account of jobbing will not be in the nature of speculation profit or speculation loss. Thus, even if it is accepted that the loss suffered by the appellant was on account of self-trading in view of proviso (c) to section 43(5) such loss cannot be treated as speculation loss.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031