Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manohar Reddy Cheruku Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Manohar Reddy Cheruku Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad — No Transfer Under JDA in Absence of Consideration & Possession u/s 53A

The assessee executed a Joint Development Agreement on 19.01.2016 but had not received any consideration whatsoever during the year. The possession, if any, was given only for the limited purpose of facilitating the developer to undertake construction, and not in the nature of possession contemplated under section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Ld. AO invoked section 45(1) and ma

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition Addition under Section 69 Cannot Be Based on Unsigned, Unacted Agreement Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Leviable Where Survey Disclosure Is Declared in Return & Accepted Recorded Sales During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained Money: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031